{"id":597724,"date":"2020-12-02T17:00:17","date_gmt":"2020-12-02T16:00:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/?p=597724"},"modified":"2023-06-23T10:51:39","modified_gmt":"2023-06-23T08:51:39","slug":"micro-magic-pretend-avoir-concu-un-processeur-risc-v-plus-performant-quun-apple-m1-ou-arm-cortex-a9","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/micro-magic-pretend-avoir-concu-un-processeur-risc-v-plus-performant-quun-apple-m1-ou-arm-cortex-a9\/","title":{"rendered":"Micro Magic pr\u00e9tend avoir con\u00e7u un processeur RISC-V plus performant qu\u2019un Apple M1 ou Arm Cortex-A9"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Lanc\u00e9e en 2010 par de chercheurs de l&#8217;Universit\u00e9 de Californie \u00e0 Berkeley, l\u2019architecture de jeu d\u2019instruction RISC-V (<em>Reduced Instruction Set Computing<\/em>), une solution enti\u00e8rement open source, a entra\u00een\u00e9 l\u2019\u00e9laboration de processeurs RISC-V par plusieurs entreprises, notamment la <a href=\"https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/fe310-le-premier-processeur-risc-v-open-source-pour-arduino\/\">startup am\u00e9ricaine SiFive<\/a>, Microsemi ou encore Western Digital. La soci\u00e9t\u00e9 californienne Micro Magic apporte sa pierre \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9difice avec une puce 64 bits annonc\u00e9e meilleure qu\u2019un Apple M1 ou qu\u2019un Arm Cortex-A9.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\"><figure class=\"aligncenter size-large\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2020\/12\/riscv-1.jpg\"><img alt=\"Image 1 : Micro Magic pr\u00e9tend avoir con\u00e7u un processeur RISC-V plus performant qu\u2019un Apple M1 ou Arm Cortex-A9\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"613\" height=\"565\" src=\"https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2020\/12\/riscv-1.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-597726\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2020\/12\/riscv-1.jpg 613w, https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2020\/12\/riscv-1-300x277.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2020\/12\/riscv-1-150x138.jpg 150w, https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2020\/12\/riscv-1-200x184.jpg 200w, https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2020\/12\/riscv-1-250x230.jpg 250w, https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2020\/12\/riscv-1-350x323.jpg 350w, https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2020\/12\/riscv-1-400x369.jpg 400w, https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2020\/12\/riscv-1-450x415.jpg 450w, https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2020\/12\/riscv-1-500x461.jpg 500w, https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2020\/12\/riscv-1-550x507.jpg 550w, https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2020\/12\/riscv-1-600x553.jpg 600w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 613px) 100vw, 613px\" \/><\/a><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p>Selon un <a aria-label=\"undefined (s\u2019ouvre dans un nouvel onglet)\" href=\"http:\/\/www.micromagic.com\/news\/RISCv-Fastest_PR.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">communiqu\u00e9<\/a> de l\u2019entreprise publi\u00e9 aujourd&#8217;hui, un c\u0153ur de son processeur RISC-V 64 bits pourrait monter \u00e0 5 GHz avec une tension de 1,1 V&nbsp;; dans ces conditions, il obtiendrait 13 000 points sur CoreMark. Toujours d\u2019apr\u00e8s cette publication, la consommation est de 0,69 mW \u00e0 3,08 GHz, pour un score CoreMark de 8 200 points ; cela donne un impressionnant <em>&#8220;110 000 CoreMarks\/Watt <\/em>[118 840]&#8221;. Par ailleurs, le site EEtimes indique que pr\u00e9c\u00e9demment, Micro Magic donnait une fr\u00e9quence de 4,25 GHz pour une tension de 0,8 V et une consommation de 200 mW ; dans ces conditions, la puce marquerait 11 000 points sur CoreMark. Un certain Andy Huang, membre de Micro Magic, a d&#8217;ailleurs r\u00e9pondu \u00e0 quelques questions d&#8217;EETimes ; l&#8217;homme en a profit\u00e9 pour vanter les performances de ce processeur RISC-V.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">L&#8217;argument : une efficacit\u00e9 \u00e9nerg\u00e9tique hors norme<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Andy Huang explique\u00a0: <em>&#8220;En utilisant <a aria-label=\"undefined (s\u2019ouvre dans un nouvel onglet)\" href=\"https:\/\/www.eembc.org\/coremark\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">le benchmark de l&#8217;EEMBC<\/a>, nous obtenons 55 000 CoreMarks par Watt<\/em> [11 000 \/ 0,2]<em>. La puce M1 r\u00e9alise environ 10 000 CoreMarks ; divisez ce chiffre par huit c\u0153urs et 15 W au total, et cela donne moins de 100 CoreMarks par Watt <\/em>[83,3]<em>. Le processeur Arm le plus rapide selon les crit\u00e8res de l&#8217;EEMBC est le Cortex-A9\u00a0; avec 22 343 CoreMarks. Divisez ce chiffre par quatre c\u0153urs et 5 W par c\u0153ur, et vous obtenez 1 112 CoreMarks par Watt <\/em>[1 117]&#8221;.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Andy Huang ajoute\u00a0: <em>&#8220;Dans les appareils actuels fonctionnant sur batterie, le CoreMarks par Watt est beaucoup plus important que le CoreMarks par Megahertz. Pour un appareil typique de 5W, nous pouvons mettre en place 25 c\u0153urs. Qui peut faire 25 c\u0153urs dans l&#8217;industrie de la t\u00e9l\u00e9phonie mobile actuellement ? La plupart se limitent \u00e0 quatre c\u0153urs ou huit c\u0153urs&#8221;<\/em>. Andy Huang indique que son entreprise proposera son processeur RISC-V \u00e0 des clients prochainement. \u00c0 ceux qui verrait l\u00e0 une d\u00e9marche commerciale, l&#8217;individu tient \u00e0 pr\u00e9ciser : <em>&#8220;<\/em>N<em>ous sommes enti\u00e8rement autofinanc\u00e9s, nous ne cherchons donc pas de financement&#8221;<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Bien s\u00fbr, ces affirmations demandent v\u00e9rification. En ce qui concerne l\u2019entreprise <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Micro_Magic\" target=\"_blank\" aria-label=\"undefined (s\u2019ouvre dans un nouvel onglet)\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Micro Magic<\/a>, sachez qu&#8217;elle a \u00e9t\u00e9 fond\u00e9e en 1995 par Mark Santoro et Lee Tavrow, deux anciens de Sun Microsystems. Juniper Networks l&#8217;avait rachet\u00e9e en d\u00e9cembre 2000 pour 260 millions de dollars.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Capable d\u2019atteindre 4,25 GHz sur un c\u0153ur avec une consommation de seulement 200 mW.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":87,"featured_media":597726,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"ep_exclude_from_search":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[487,4071,4110],"tags":[],"hubs":[],"acf":{"display_mode":"medium-img","post_show_excerpt":true,"post_source":"","hide_sidebar":false,"hide_advertising":false},"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v21.5 (Yoast SEO v22.5) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Micro Magic pr\u00e9tend avoir con\u00e7u un processeur RISC-V plus performant qu\u2019un Apple M1 ou Arm Cortex-A9<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Capable d\u2019atteindre 4,25 GHz sur un c\u0153ur avec une consommation de seulement 200 mW.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/micro-magic-pretend-avoir-concu-un-processeur-risc-v-plus-performant-quun-apple-m1-ou-arm-cortex-a9\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"fr_FR\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Micro Magic pr\u00e9tend avoir con\u00e7u un processeur RISC-V plus performant qu\u2019un Apple M1 ou Arm Cortex-A9\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Capable d\u2019atteindre 4,25 GHz sur un c\u0153ur avec une consommation de seulement 200 mW.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/micro-magic-pretend-avoir-concu-un-processeur-risc-v-plus-performant-quun-apple-m1-ou-arm-cortex-a9\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Tom\u2019s Hardware\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/TomsHardwareFrance\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-12-02T16:00:17+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-06-23T08:51:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2020\/12\/riscv-1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"613\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"565\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"R\u00e9mi Bouvet\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@tomshardware_fr\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@tomshardware_fr\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/micro-magic-pretend-avoir-concu-un-processeur-risc-v-plus-performant-quun-apple-m1-ou-arm-cortex-a9\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/micro-magic-pretend-avoir-concu-un-processeur-risc-v-plus-performant-quun-apple-m1-ou-arm-cortex-a9\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"R\u00e9mi Bouvet\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/#\/schema\/person\/5ccbd8cbd7e2cc86da6a517f62b4d005\"},\"headline\":\"Micro Magic pr\u00e9tend avoir con\u00e7u un processeur RISC-V plus performant qu\u2019un Apple M1 ou Arm Cortex-A9\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-12-02T16:00:17+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-06-23T08:51:39+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/micro-magic-pretend-avoir-concu-un-processeur-risc-v-plus-performant-quun-apple-m1-ou-arm-cortex-a9\/\"},\"wordCount\":456,\"commentCount\":4,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/micro-magic-pretend-avoir-concu-un-processeur-risc-v-plus-performant-quun-apple-m1-ou-arm-cortex-a9\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2020\/12\/riscv-1.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Actualit\u00e9\",\"Processeurs\",\"R&amp;D\"],\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/micro-magic-pretend-avoir-concu-un-processeur-risc-v-plus-performant-quun-apple-m1-ou-arm-cortex-a9\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/micro-magic-pretend-avoir-concu-un-processeur-risc-v-plus-performant-quun-apple-m1-ou-arm-cortex-a9\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/micro-magic-pretend-avoir-concu-un-processeur-risc-v-plus-performant-quun-apple-m1-ou-arm-cortex-a9\/\",\"name\":\"Micro Magic pr\u00e9tend avoir con\u00e7u un processeur RISC-V plus performant qu\u2019un Apple M1 ou Arm Cortex-A9\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/micro-magic-pretend-avoir-concu-un-processeur-risc-v-plus-performant-quun-apple-m1-ou-arm-cortex-a9\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/micro-magic-pretend-avoir-concu-un-processeur-risc-v-plus-performant-quun-apple-m1-ou-arm-cortex-a9\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2020\/12\/riscv-1.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-12-02T16:00:17+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-06-23T08:51:39+00:00\",\"description\":\"Capable d\u2019atteindre 4,25 GHz sur un c\u0153ur avec une consommation de seulement 200 mW.\",\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/micro-magic-pretend-avoir-concu-un-processeur-risc-v-plus-performant-quun-apple-m1-ou-arm-cortex-a9\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/micro-magic-pretend-avoir-concu-un-processeur-risc-v-plus-performant-quun-apple-m1-ou-arm-cortex-a9\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2020\/12\/riscv-1.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2020\/12\/riscv-1.jpg\",\"width\":613,\"height\":565},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/\",\"name\":\"Tom\u2019s Hardware\",\"description\":\"Toute l&#039;info hardware et gaming !\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Tom\u2019s Hardware\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/th.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/th.png\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":1000,\"caption\":\"Tom\u2019s Hardware\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/TomsHardwareFrance\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/tomshardware_fr\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/#\/schema\/person\/5ccbd8cbd7e2cc86da6a517f62b4d005\",\"name\":\"R\u00e9mi Bouvet\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"fr-FR\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a08bb358c2a9fc36265e8f3225c5de08?s=64&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a08bb358c2a9fc36265e8f3225c5de08?s=64&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"R\u00e9mi Bouvet\"},\"description\":\"Pas du tout convaincu que \\\"c'\u00e9tait mieux avant\\\", je pr\u00e9f\u00e8re m'int\u00e9resser \u00e0 demain plut\u00f4t que fantasmer hier. Alors devant une carte Voodoo, j'aurais certainement la m\u00eame attitude qu'un singe devant une \u0153uvre d'art. Pour finir, je le confesse, je pr\u00e9f\u00e8re Fallout 4 \u00e0 Fallout, Doom 2016 \u00e0 Doom, Civilization VI \u00e0 Civilization, eFootball \u00e0 PE... non, l\u00e0, faut tout de m\u00eame pas d\u00e9conner.\",\"sameAs\":[\"www.linkedin.com\/in\/r\u00e9mi-bouvet-96049a151\"],\"honorificPrefix\":\"Sieur\",\"gender\":\"Homme\",\"knowsLanguage\":[\"Fran\u00e7ais\",\"Anglais\",\"Burgonde\"],\"jobTitle\":\"R\u00e9dacteur\",\"worksFor\":\"Galaxie Media\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/author\/remi\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Micro Magic pr\u00e9tend avoir con\u00e7u un processeur RISC-V plus performant qu\u2019un Apple M1 ou Arm Cortex-A9","description":"Capable d\u2019atteindre 4,25 GHz sur un c\u0153ur avec une consommation de seulement 200 mW.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/micro-magic-pretend-avoir-concu-un-processeur-risc-v-plus-performant-quun-apple-m1-ou-arm-cortex-a9\/","og_locale":"fr_FR","og_type":"article","og_title":"Micro Magic pr\u00e9tend avoir con\u00e7u un processeur RISC-V plus performant qu\u2019un Apple M1 ou Arm Cortex-A9","og_description":"Capable d\u2019atteindre 4,25 GHz sur un c\u0153ur avec une consommation de seulement 200 mW.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/micro-magic-pretend-avoir-concu-un-processeur-risc-v-plus-performant-quun-apple-m1-ou-arm-cortex-a9\/","og_site_name":"Tom\u2019s Hardware","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/TomsHardwareFrance\/","article_published_time":"2020-12-02T16:00:17+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-06-23T08:51:39+00:00","og_image":[{"width":613,"height":565,"url":"https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2020\/12\/riscv-1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"R\u00e9mi Bouvet","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@tomshardware_fr","twitter_site":"@tomshardware_fr","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/micro-magic-pretend-avoir-concu-un-processeur-risc-v-plus-performant-quun-apple-m1-ou-arm-cortex-a9\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/micro-magic-pretend-avoir-concu-un-processeur-risc-v-plus-performant-quun-apple-m1-ou-arm-cortex-a9\/"},"author":{"name":"R\u00e9mi Bouvet","@id":"https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/#\/schema\/person\/5ccbd8cbd7e2cc86da6a517f62b4d005"},"headline":"Micro Magic pr\u00e9tend avoir con\u00e7u un processeur RISC-V plus performant qu\u2019un Apple M1 ou Arm Cortex-A9","datePublished":"2020-12-02T16:00:17+00:00","dateModified":"2023-06-23T08:51:39+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/micro-magic-pretend-avoir-concu-un-processeur-risc-v-plus-performant-quun-apple-m1-ou-arm-cortex-a9\/"},"wordCount":456,"commentCount":4,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/micro-magic-pretend-avoir-concu-un-processeur-risc-v-plus-performant-quun-apple-m1-ou-arm-cortex-a9\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2020\/12\/riscv-1.jpg","articleSection":["Actualit\u00e9","Processeurs","R&amp;D"],"inLanguage":"fr-FR","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/micro-magic-pretend-avoir-concu-un-processeur-risc-v-plus-performant-quun-apple-m1-ou-arm-cortex-a9\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/micro-magic-pretend-avoir-concu-un-processeur-risc-v-plus-performant-quun-apple-m1-ou-arm-cortex-a9\/","url":"https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/micro-magic-pretend-avoir-concu-un-processeur-risc-v-plus-performant-quun-apple-m1-ou-arm-cortex-a9\/","name":"Micro Magic pr\u00e9tend avoir con\u00e7u un processeur RISC-V plus performant qu\u2019un Apple M1 ou Arm Cortex-A9","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/micro-magic-pretend-avoir-concu-un-processeur-risc-v-plus-performant-quun-apple-m1-ou-arm-cortex-a9\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/micro-magic-pretend-avoir-concu-un-processeur-risc-v-plus-performant-quun-apple-m1-ou-arm-cortex-a9\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2020\/12\/riscv-1.jpg","datePublished":"2020-12-02T16:00:17+00:00","dateModified":"2023-06-23T08:51:39+00:00","description":"Capable d\u2019atteindre 4,25 GHz sur un c\u0153ur avec une consommation de seulement 200 mW.","inLanguage":"fr-FR","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/micro-magic-pretend-avoir-concu-un-processeur-risc-v-plus-performant-quun-apple-m1-ou-arm-cortex-a9\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"fr-FR","@id":"https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/micro-magic-pretend-avoir-concu-un-processeur-risc-v-plus-performant-quun-apple-m1-ou-arm-cortex-a9\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2020\/12\/riscv-1.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2020\/12\/riscv-1.jpg","width":613,"height":565},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/","name":"Tom\u2019s Hardware","description":"Toute l&#039;info hardware et gaming !","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"fr-FR"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/#organization","name":"Tom\u2019s Hardware","url":"https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"fr-FR","@id":"https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/th.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/06\/th.png","width":1000,"height":1000,"caption":"Tom\u2019s Hardware"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/TomsHardwareFrance\/","https:\/\/x.com\/tomshardware_fr"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/#\/schema\/person\/5ccbd8cbd7e2cc86da6a517f62b4d005","name":"R\u00e9mi Bouvet","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"fr-FR","@id":"https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a08bb358c2a9fc36265e8f3225c5de08?s=64&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a08bb358c2a9fc36265e8f3225c5de08?s=64&d=mm&r=g","caption":"R\u00e9mi Bouvet"},"description":"Pas du tout convaincu que \"c'\u00e9tait mieux avant\", je pr\u00e9f\u00e8re m'int\u00e9resser \u00e0 demain plut\u00f4t que fantasmer hier. Alors devant une carte Voodoo, j'aurais certainement la m\u00eame attitude qu'un singe devant une \u0153uvre d'art. Pour finir, je le confesse, je pr\u00e9f\u00e8re Fallout 4 \u00e0 Fallout, Doom 2016 \u00e0 Doom, Civilization VI \u00e0 Civilization, eFootball \u00e0 PE... non, l\u00e0, faut tout de m\u00eame pas d\u00e9conner.","sameAs":["www.linkedin.com\/in\/r\u00e9mi-bouvet-96049a151"],"honorificPrefix":"Sieur","gender":"Homme","knowsLanguage":["Fran\u00e7ais","Anglais","Burgonde"],"jobTitle":"R\u00e9dacteur","worksFor":"Galaxie Media","url":"https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/author\/remi\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/597724"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/87"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=597724"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/597724\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/597726"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=597724"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=597724"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=597724"},{"taxonomy":"hubs","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tomshardware.fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/hubs?post=597724"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}